In wat blyk om sy intreerede blog gepos, chiqnlips gedelf in die waansin wat is 'n berekende kolom en beskryf 'n oplossing vir 'n gemeenskaplike SharePoint Designer workflow e-pos aktiwiteit probleem: Hoe om 'n persoon se regte naam te vertoon in 'n e-pos in plaas van "domein gebruikersnaam."
Ek het dit nie getoets myself, but it looks promising. Check dit uit.
</einde>
Volg my op Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
Ek het gelees 'n paar retrospectieves op 2008 and this has got me to thinking about 2009. Here are my guesses at the future of SharePoint in 2009.
Ek is 'n SharePoint MVP en as gevolg, I sometimes get a little advance information before it’s public. I am NOT making any such information public. I really haven’t been around long enough to be entrusted with that kind of stuff anyway.
Met dit uit die pad, op die voorspellings ...
I believe that FAST will become a very hot topic in 2009. It’s already well known in the enterprise search community. Egter, almal wat speel rond met SharePoint in 2009 will soon be interested in this product and what it can do for them. New consulting companies will spring up around it and existing partners will work and scramble to add it to its portfolio. This time next year, byna almal in die SharePoint gemeenskap sal gehoor het van en 'n mening oor FAST.
FAST is targeted at large companies and that will continue. I think there’s at least an outside chance that Microsoft will release a more focused version of the product that is accessible to smaller companies. Failing that, they will open up the SharePoint search engine so that it can be customized along the lines that FAST can be customized. Byvoorbeeld, FAST uses pipeline architecture for consuming content and indexing it. FAST admins and developers can assemble pipeline components per data source and even create new pipeline components. We don’t have this flexibility with SharePoint today. If FAST remains firmly targeted at very large companies, SharePoint soek sal neem sommige van FAST se funksies.
Ek glo dit sal kom in 2009.
I believe that it will provide us the ability to secure views on a list or document library. This may be more of a hope than a belief 🙂
Ek hoop dit sal 'n beter ondersteuning vir gebruikers voorsien in SharePoint Designer en veral workflow.
Ek het nie veel anders weet, I have been actively tracking what I do find here: http://delicious.com/pagalvin/SharePoint_O14.
Vandag, most SharePoint vendors seem to be gadget oriented. Take Bamboes of Corasworks byvoorbeeld. They have a huge following and great portfolio of products. Egter, dit lyk asof hulle soort van gadgety vir my of ontwikkelaar / tool focused. Admin tools, workflow tools, ens.. That’s not a criticism at all because SharePoint can definitely use some gadgets.
In 2009, sommige verkopers (en heel moontlik Bamboo hulself, As ek dit gelees het korrek) bymekaar sal sit verticalized besigheid aansoeke in die vorm van templates, funksies, oplossings, ens.. I’m thinking about the fabulous forty templates today but tailored to specific industries. I’m sort of surprised it’s not already exploited this way. SharePoint is a platform for delivering these kinds of things. What’s everyone waiting for? They won’t wait any longer in 2009.
Op dieselfde tyd, Silverlight and other cool .NET stuff will fuel new, better and more interesting gadgets.
Sharepointreviews.com will become the essential community catalog of these products.
2009 will see the emergence of the End User as a major focus for bloggers, organizations and Microsoft themselves. Mark Miller’s End User SharePoint.Com played a big role in 2008 and will continue to do so in 2009. End Users will begin to blog, help to transform user groups into less technical venues and even convince someone or organization to launch a pure End User focused conference.
Speaking of conferences – they will continue to expand and grow in number and focus. Aside from end user content, they will continue to cater to developers and administrators.
Virtual conferences will start to pick up and existing conferences will provide live feeds to remote attendees who cannot or choose not to attend in person.
Free venues will expand, soos Mike Lotter’s (et al) SharePoint Saterdag.
This is going to be very important because there will continue to be a large influx of new developers, admins and end users who will be craving the kind of information these groups provide.
Demand for social computing features will rise. All things being equal, maatskappye wat implementeer effektiewe sosiale rekenaar strategieë sal beter doen en sterker wees as hulle mededingers.
Kleiner maatskappye sal neem hierdie funksies meer vinnig en doeltreffend as groot maatskappye.
Groot maatskappye: beware 🙂
In 2008, 'n baie SharePoint bloggers en organisasies en Microsoft hulself spandeer baie tyd uitzoeken die beste manier is om sekere probleme op te los (gewoonlik tegniese probleme).
There are still opportunities to define and foster adoption of best practices. Egter, terwyl ons al uitzoeken die beste manier om te installeer, instel en bestuur SharePoint, honderde en duisende van maatskappye is die installering, configuring and managing SharePoint without those best practices at hand.
In 2009, a lot of companies are going to realize they have some deeply rooted problems to solve and will be looking to the elite members of the SharePoint community and Microsoft for help to fix them. I think this will extend well into 2010 and possibly spawn a cottage industry providing remediation services for companies that really need and use SharePoint, but are hurting badly because of poor decisions made early in their implementation.
In 2009, the Mother Ship will return and bring Bob Fox home.
I didn’t start working with SharePoint myself in any real way until January 2007. Dit lyk vir my dat SharePoint regtig geneem het en bewys kan lewer 'n baie waarde in hierdie twee jaar. Ek dink dat in baie maniere, Dit het nie regtig reguit self uit totdat die infrastruktuur werk. Dit het nog steeds sy foute en probleme, maar ons het almal kom langs pad sedert 01/2007. 2009 gaan 'n banier jaar vir SharePoint wees.
</einde>
Volg my op Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
Ek sal moet doen twee voorleggings by die SharePoint beste praktyke konferensie in Februarie in San Diego.
Ek het nie hierdie ding lank genoeg te kry verveeld deur dit, so elke konferensie Ek woon is 'n, eerlik, ontsagwekkende. Egter, I do think this conference is special. There is zero marketing focus and the whole thing is about offering real-world practical advice on how to untangle some of the thorniest issues we face dealing with SharePoint. It’s not gigantic, sodat al die sprekers is baie toeganklik (ten minste wanneer hulle nie om uit vure terug by die huis). This means that in addition to the great formal presentations, jy kan 'n paar groot gesprekke en debatte met feitlik elke spreker by byna enige tyd, starting with communal breakfast up to late night imbibing at the hotel bar.
Bo en behalwe die sprekers, you’ll have great opportunities to build and cement networks of other SharePoint users in the community. By the end of the last session and conference wrap-up, jy sal energiek en vol goeie idees terug te bring om te werk om te help om jou SharePoint omgewing verbeter.
Dit is die moeite werd om die belegging.
The web site is top notch. Check dit uit vir datums, registrasie, onderwerpe en sprekers.
</einde>
Volg my op Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
Die afgelope somer, terwyl ek besig was op twee hoofstukke vir die beste SharePoint sosiale rekenaar boek wat nog ooit, I began to get very far behind in my blog reading. I use Google Reader for my RSS stuff and when you have more than 1000 ongelees items, dit sê net, "1000 ".
Oor die afgelope paar weke, Ek het gaan sit en stelselmatig te lees en om hulle te etiketteer as ek gaan vir toekomstige verwysing (Ek gebruik Delicious.com).
Die afgelope naweek het ek al verlore, seisoen vier in 'n paar van die sittings en vang op 1000+ blog inskrywings voel dieselfde manier.
</einde>
Volg my op Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
Mark Miller oor te www.endusersharepoint.com gepos my jongste artikel oor SharePoint Designer workflow hier (http://www.endusersharepoint.com/?p=1037).
I describe the basic approach for moving a workflow you create in one list to another list. The other list can be in the same site, dieselfde plek versameling of 'n heeltemal ander plaas (bijv. van ontwikkeling tot produksie).
This is a complicated subject so I only covered a very basic scenario. Volgende week, I’ll write up a more useful real world example.
Check dit uit en deel enige kommentaar daar.
<einde>
Volg my op Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
Mark Miller het my laaste End User georiënteerde SharePoint Designer Workflow artikel geplaas op sy webwerf hier: http://www.endusersharepoint.com/?p=1008
Ek probeer om 'n reguit-vorentoe antwoord op die vraag te voorsien, "Hoekom kan ek nie maklik hawe 'n SharePoint ontwerper workflow van ontwikkeling om te toets?" In the process, Ek gee ook 'n insig in wat SPD is eintlik agter die skerms toe ons dit gebruik om 'n workflow te skep.
Volgende week, Ek beskryf 'n eindgebruiker vriendelike manier na die hawe SPD workflow van een bediener na 'n ander, of ten minste as eindgebruiker vriendelik 'n oplossing as moontlik is gegewe die toestand van die instrument stel.
</einde>
Volg my op Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
I had the good fortune of attending some partner training from FAST last spring. I was really impressed with the product and was looking forward to working with it. Ongelukkig, one project fell through and then EMC acquired my company. Predictably, a certain amount of chaos ensued while we learned about EMC and EMC learned about us. FAST technology dropped a few points on the priority scale during that period. Egter, Ek het nog nooit het my belangstelling in die produk en, meer interessant, die groter probleem van vindbaarheid.
Ek het regtig nie hou nie dat die woord, but I’m trying to get used to it 🙂 Despite it’s awkwardness, vindbaarheid is 'n ware (of ten minste, opkomende) term. Do a Live Search As jy belangstel in die vind van meer tegniese definisies, maar die manier waarop ek verduidelik dit rondom die kantoor is soos hierdie:
Intellektuele kapitaal wat nie gevind kan word, kan ook nie bestaan nie.
Dit is amper soos ware om dit te sê:
Intellektuele kapitaal wat nie gevind kan word vinnig en maklik kan net sowel nie bestaan nie.
Intellektuele kapitaal (IC) starts as an idea in a person’s head and is then refined via collaboration with colleagues and interactions with various communities. To be truly useful, these resulting ideas must be recorded. This is where the trouble begins 🙂
Hierdie dae, opname gewoonlik beteken dat die idee is gedokumenteer in die vorm van 'n MS Word doc, Excel werkboek, ens.. and eventually stuck in electronic format on a hard drive somewhere. IC obviously takes other forms like, soos beelde, videos, hoogs insiggewende blogs, wikis … it’s impossible to list them all. Op dieselfde tyd, IC gestoor word in 'n verskeidenheid van plekke soos lêer stelsels, databasisse, lyn van besigheid aansoeke (ERP, CRM, SharePoint, Documentum), ens..
Dit is die vindbaarheid probleem: hoe kan vinnig en maklik te vind pakkie wat in dekades of honderde van formaat in dekades of honderde duisende gestoor word, tienduisende (durf ek sê honderde duisende) van die plekke in 'n organisasie?
It’s a difficult problem to solve. Bill Engels skryf oor vindbaarheid from a very grand perspective in what I have come to think of as the Panama Canal approach. The history of the Panama Canal is amazing. In a nut shell, 'n mal Fransman (Ferdinand de Lesseps) begin met 'n private maatskappy om die kanaal te bou, die projek is laat vaar vir 'n paar jaar, picked up again and finally finished by the American government under President Roosevelt. This reminds me of Bill’s approach because as he rightly points out, solving the findability is both hard and never stops. It took years and years of effort from the some of the hardest working humans on the planet to start, voortgaan, en uiteindelik voltooi). And yet, it’s still not truly finished. Sover ek weet, die kanaal se banke het nog nooit met hul rushoek, meaning that they have to be shored up and otherwise maintained even to this day. Solving findability is the same way. I definitely recommend that you read Bill’s series and subscribe to his blog for his point of view on findability, veral as dit verband hou met SharePoint.
I too am interested in this problem. Due to my exposure to FAST and on-going discussions on this subject with my brilliant EMC colleagues, I have some more ideas I plan to write about over the coming weeks and months. In my next article on this little series, Ek gaan om te probeer en sit 'n boks rondom die probleem om te wys hoe verskriklik dit regtig is (it’s more awful than you think 🙂 ). It’s awful, but at least it does fit inside a box.
</einde>
Volg my op Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
Een van die … newe-effekte … of working for a giant corporation is that I get a lot press releases in my inbox every month. I’m still new to the EMC world, so baie van hierdie persvrystellings, basies, inscrutable. This or that company purchased these or those EMC products, blah blah blah. I’m not complaining. I actually take this as an incentive to learn more about EMC as time goes by so that I better understand the big picture of what EMC is all about (WENK: dit is oor die Inligting).
Sommige tye, diegene persverklarings is baie maklik om te verstaan en een van hulle was omtrent Mozy. Mozy is an on-line backup tool. You install a lightweight client on your workstation (laptop in my geval), jy sê dit wat jy wil om te back-up en wanneer en dan is dit maak dit deur die stuur van jou data na 'n bediener(s) on the cloud. It does it in the background.
My aanvanklike Friends hardloop in net onder 4 hours and according to Mozy is 550MB or so of data. I only backed up "My Documents" (dus, die relatief klein bedrag van data).
Dit het weer (Ek dink 24 uur later), gerugsteun sommige meer dinge in oor 8 minute. I never noticed it happen. There was no obvious impact on any work I was doing at the time.
Ek het 'n toets herstel en dit bied 'n ordentlike genoeg user om die lêer te kies(s) you want to restore. It was quick, pittige, insiggewende … Ek weet nie hoe dit kon beter wees.
I spoke to one of my colleagues about it who has more experience with online backup. He said that Mozy is good but that it lacks an ability to tell Mozy to do the equivalent of "restore files that I deleted." This is to say that if you don’t know you deleted a fie, of as jy dit doen, maar kan nie onthou sy naam, Mozy kan nie help nie veel in terme van maklik om dit te herstel.
They impose a 2GB limit if you just want to use the service for free. It looks like it’s $5/month for unlimited storage.
Bottom line, As iemand my vra as hulle moet Mozy gebruik vir aanlyn Friends, my antwoord is nou, "Hell, yes."
</einde>
Volg my op Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
