Ek doen 'n soektog op Google:
Ek kliek op die skakel hierbo uitgelig ("Download besonderhede: WSS…").
Ek kry hierdie:
Note the URL.
Looks pretty suspicious to me. I don’t know if I should laugh, gnuiven of bel 'n priester.
</einde>
Ek het net afgedank word om die kapasiteit beplanning hulpmiddel wat al die woede hierdie dae.
Ek vind dit maklik om te gebruik en vinnig 'n kliënt omgewing geskoei, ek gewerk het op hierdie afgelope somer.
Met 'n paar angs, Ek die finale OK knoppie gedruk en dit aanbeveel om iets wat is redelik soortgelyk aan wat ons het ons kliënt (ons eintlik gegooi in 'n tweede aansoek bediener vir die toekoms blink gebruik). I take that to be a good sign and increases my confidence in the tool.
Dit lyk redelik kragtige dinge 'n baie beter beginpunt as 'n leë bladsy.
I like that lets you get into some good detail about the environment. How many users, hoe jy die projek sal hulle gebruik om die stelsel (publishing, samewerking, ens.), kantoor en aansluit / network capacity between them and the mama server. Good stuff.
Dit vra breë gebaseerde vrae en dan kan jy verander om die besonderhede vir 'n mooi korrel model van jou omgewing.
Ek aarsel dit te laai want ek het so baie ander dinge om te kyk na dit, read and try to digest. I’m glad I did.
It’s an easy two-step process. Download system center capacity planner and then download the SharePoint models. It runs nicely on Windows XP.
Gebaseer op my vinnige indruk, Ek kan nie sien hoe dit kan rekening vir:
Diegene gemodelleer kan word en ek het net nie sien dat hulle in die 10 minuut review.
Ek sal beslis gebruik dit op my volgende kliënt.
As ek nie 'n konsultant en in plaas daarvan om vir 'n werklike maatskappy :), I’d model my current environment and see how the tool’s recommended model matches up against reality. That would be pretty neat. It could lead to some good infrastructure discussion.
</einde>
UPDATE: Ek gepos hierdie vraag hier aan MSDN (http://forums.microsoft.com/Forums/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=2808543&SiteID=1&mode=1) and Michael Washam of Microsoft responded with a concise answer.
Ek het 'n web om op te tree as 'n BDC-vriendelike fasade to a SharePoint list. Toe ek dit uit my ontwikkeling omgewing, dit werk goed. Wanneer ek migreer na 'n nuwe bediener, Ek het hierdie probleem ondervind:
| System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Die Web aansoek by http://localhost/sandbox kon nie gevind word nie. Kontroleer dat jy die URL korrek ingetik het. As die URL moet bedien word om bestaande inhoud, die stelsel administrateur mag nodig wees om 'n nuwe versoek URL kartering te voeg tot die voorgenome aansoek. by Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSite .. ctor(SPFarm vrag, Uri requestUri, Boole contextSite, SPUserToken userToken) by Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSite .. ctor(String requestUrl) by Conchango.xyzzy.GetExistingDocument(String minId, String maxId, String titleFilter) in C:\Documents and Settings Paul My Documents Visual Studio 2005 Projekte Xyzzy BDC_DocReview BDC_DocReview DocReviewFacade.asmx.cs:lyn 69 |
Hier is lyn 69:
die gebruik van (SPSite webwerf = nuwe SPSite("http://localhost/sandbox"))
Ek het probeer om die verskillende variasies op die URL, insluitend die gebruik van die bediener se regte naam, die IP-adres, die sleep houe op die URL, ens.. I always got that error.
Ek gebruik Die Google to research it. Lots of people face this issue, of variasies daarvan, maar niemand het dit opgelos.
Speels MOSS so 'n gedetailleerde fout dat dit nie gebeur het nie vir my om seker te maak 12 hive logs. Uiteindelik, oor 24 uur na my kollega Aanbevole ek dit doen, Ek nagegaan word uit die 12 korf log en het gevind dat hierdie:
'N Uitsondering het voorgekom terwyl hy probeer om die plaas aan te skaf: System.Security.SecurityException: Versoek register toegang nie toegelaat. by System.ThrowHelper.ThrowSecurityException(ExceptionResource hulpbron) op (String naam, Boole skryfbaar) op (String naam) op () op () op (SPFarm& plaas, Boole& isJoined) Die Seun van die vergadering wat versuim het om: MyComputer |
Dit het nuwe moontlikhede van navorsing, so was dit terug na die Google. Dit het my gelei tot hierdie forum post: http://forums.codecharge.com / posts.php?post_id = 67.135. That didn’t really help me but it did start making me think there was a database and/or security issue. I soldiered on and Andrew Connell se post finally triggered the thought that I should make sure that the application pool’s identity account had appropriate access to the database. I thought it already did. Egter, my kollega het gegaan en het die app swembad identiteit rekening volle toegang tot SQL.
Sodra sy dat verandering, everything started working.
Wat volgende gebeur is die beste uitgedruk as 'n haiku gedig:
Probleme verhoog hul hande.
You swing and miss. Try again.
Sukses! But how? Hoekom?
Sy wou nie dinge te los soos wat, verkies om die minimum vereiste toestemming te gee (en waarskynlik met die oog op die skryf van 'n blog inskrywing; Ek klop haar aan die punch, muhahahahaha!).
Sy verwyder opeenvolgende regte van die app swembad identiteit rekening tot … there was no longer any explicit permission for the app pool identity account at all. The web service continued to work just fine.
We went and rebooted the servers. Everything continued to work fine.
So, te Kortom: we gave the app pool identity full access and then took it away. The web service started working and never stopped working. Bizarre.
As iemand weet waarom dit gewerk het, los 'n comment.
</einde>
Ek het 'n besigheid scenario soos hierdie:
"Collect Data from a User" skep 'n item in 'n taak lys om goedkeuring vir daardie dokument.
Ek nodig het om 'n siening van die taak lys wat gewys het dringende versoeke vir goedkeuring te skep.
Oplossing: Put the word "URGENT:" into the title of these tasks.
I would have preferred to specify the priority field directly. Egter, Ek was nie in staat om dit te doen om verskeie redes:
Ek het gesien hoe 'n paar benaderings voor (gelukkig) realizing we could just put "urgent" in die titel.
Daar is 'n nadeel aan my oplossing (Afgesien van die ooglopende feit dat slegs die teks van die titel dui op die dringendheid). Since "collect feedback" slegs aanvaar die hard gekodeer titel name, I need to use two different collect feedback actions whose only difference is that hard coded title.
Maar, ten minste is daar 'n oplossing wat nie geval ontvangers of persoonlike SPD aksies vereis.
As iemand opgelos in 'n slim manier, laat weet my asseblief.
</einde>
One of the many joys I take in being the parent of a ten year old boy is finding new ways to make him laugh or think a little differently about questions and things in the world. I’ve used these techniques over the years:
===
Misconstrue sy vrae:
Sy: Watter dag is dit?
Pa: Een dag voor Woensdag.
S: Nie, what day of the month is it?
D: O, it’s 4 days after Jan 25.
===
Tickle him and tell him you’ll stop when he stops laughing.
===
Go down stairs to the TV room and announce, "It’s good to be the daddy." Toe, pick him up to get the warm spot on the couch and change the channel to something good, like the Scifi channel.
===
Read stories out loud. Insert ridiculous sentences in the middle of the story. My favorite is to add "killing him instantly" when the main characters encounters some minor trouble. Byvoorbeeld, "the knife slipped in his hand, cutting his index finger, killing him instantly." Nothing quite gets your son out of a complacent and passive listening mode as the main character being killed instantly.
===
Read stories incorrectly. Read sentences backward. The best part of this is that the first couple of times I did this, my son thought he was helping me out by pointing out that I wasn’t reading the words in the right order. The down side is that he really doesn’t want me to read to him any more.
===
Go to Burger King for lunch. My son would eat BK morning, night and day if we let him. When going, tell him, "I know you hate going there, but we simply have no choice." When he tries to explain that he loves BK, talk over him and say things like "We don’t have time to argue about it! We’re going and I don’t want to have a discussion!"
(This reminds me of my favorite Borg joke: "Borger King: We do it our way. Your way is irrelevant." hahaha!)
===
Open a book to page 9 and say, "hmm, that’s an odd page".
===
Fill the world with arch enemies. "We’re going to run quick over toe 7-11, arch-enemy of 11-7".
"Your aunt lives in Ringwood, arch enemy to the town of Squarewood."
===
We drive up to Massachusetts from New Jersey several times a year and it often takes about 5 hours door to door. As we arrive home and pull into the driveway say, "oh, I forgot, we need to make a quick dash to Home Depot."
===
When watching a violent episode in a TV show (such as Heroes), tell your son, "some times, at work, I need to destroy my enemies by burning them alive using the powers of my mind. I don’t like doing it, but you gotta do what you gotta do."
===
When watching bad horror movies (see "It’s good to be the Daddy" bo), ascribe improbable motives to the evil character. Byvoorbeeld, tell your son that the reason Jason is so angry is because he wants some cake and they won’t let him have any.
===
Explain phone numbers incorrectly. Instead of telling your son to dial "201-111-2222", tell him it’s "2-011-1-12222".
===
What tricks do you use?
</einde>
It seems fairly common in the political blogging world for a given blog to host a "guest blogger". When I’m in political blog land I must be wearing a different pair of eye glasses because it never occurred to me that "guest blogging" might make sense for a technical blog like mine. That is, until I read this post by Kanwal Khipple over at The Best of SharePoint Buzz- Januarie 2008.
Thinking on it, I believe there could be a lot of people out there in SharePoint land that have the itch to put together an article, short or long, technical or more business oriented, ens., but don’t run their own blog for all the usual reasons. If you’re one of those people, I’d be happy to host it. You can reach me via email or leave a comment. I haven’t thought through any kind of guidelines, but I suppose that I’d want it to be oriented around SharePoint, but I also like to throw in some personal observations about consulting now en dan. I’m also trying to publish a "Sondag Funny" every week and I’m bound to run out of ideas for that.
If you’re a regular blogger already but would like to experiment with guest blogging, I’m definitely open to that too, óf as gasheer óf as gas 🙂
</einde>
As die instrument dinge doen wat jy nie verstaan nie en dan is dit nie in stap n van 'n onbekende aantal stappe, jy is dood in die water…
</einde>
Ek was weer knutselen BDC ADF lêers met die hand (sodat ek kan opbou my "kry uit my grasperk!" Ek) en hierdie pragtige fout getref:
"Application definition import failed. Die volgende fout het voorgekom:"
Soos jy kan sien, daar is 'n fout, maar … dit gaan nie om my te vertel wat dit is.
In my geval, the issue turned out that I had started off with a functional ADF for a different project that connected to a database and executed a SQL query against a view. In this new project, I am calling a method on a web service. I had stripped out the DB specific stuff and added my web service stuff, maar versuim het om die werk <LobSystem>’s Type attribute. I switched it to "WebService" en ek gelukkig verskuif na nuwer en meer opwindend invoer foute, wat gehanteer is met verloop van tyd.
Hier is die verkeerde LobSystem:
<LobSystem
xmlns:XSi =http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
XSi:schemaLocation =http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/03/BusinessDataCatalogBDCMetadata.xsd
Type="Database"
Version="1.0.0.0" Name="xyzzy"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/03/BusinessDataCatalog">
Dit is korrek:
<LobSystem
xmlns:XSi =http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
XSi:schemaLocation =http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/03/BusinessDataCatalogBDCMetadata.xsd
Type="WebService"
Version="1.0.0.0" Name="xyzzy"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/03/BusinessDataCatalog">
</einde>
UPDATE: Hierdie MSDN gepos het 'n paar interessante waarnemings van JXJ gebaseer op sy, hoofsaaklik negatiewe, ervarings om af te gaan hierdie pad: http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=2623565&SiteID=1
Ons het 'n besigheid scenario waar ons moet twee dokumente biblioteke te koppel deur 'n gemeenskaplike "dokument ID" veld.
We often use a lookup column to implements links like this. There are several drawbacks to lookup columns, waarvan drie:
Gerugsteun deur BDC, we can use a "business data" column type and it provides a superior search and even allows multiple columns of data to appear in list views.
Ek het 'n paar voorlopige sukses met hierdie benadering en beplan om meer daaroor te skryf.
As jy gewerk het hierdie hoek voor en enige kommentaar, asseblief deel!
</einde>
Ek werk met BDC vandag, coding ADF files by hand and generating myself some errors. One such error:
Aansoek definisie invoer het misluk. Die volgende fout het voorgekom: Kon nie laai Tipe beskryf deur TypeDescriptor se Type Name. Parameter naam: Type Name Daar was fout tydens of net voor Line: '35’ en posisie: ’20’.
MOSS vertoon hierdie fout toe ek probeer het om die ADF XML-lêer in te voer.
Ek het ondersoek ingestel na die Inter en gevind dat ek die lob byvoorbeeld die naam van verwysing (van die <LobSystemInstance>) in my <TypeDescriptor> node as ek moet verwys die lob naam self (uit <LobSystem>).
Verkeerd:
<TypeDescriptor Type Name = "Conchango.KeyValue, Lob aanleg Naam" Naam = "KeyValue-">
Korrigeer:
<TypeDescriptor Type Name = "Conchango.KeyValue, Lob Naam" Naam = "KeyValue-">
Hoop hierdie een slaan iemand 'n uur of twee van die tyd.
</einde>
