Moj kolega, David Drinkwine, does a (slightly more than) pen-on-napkin estimate for building a truly world class intranet for a large enterprise organization. Možete read about it here: (http://www.bigapplesharepoint.com/pages/View-An-Insight.aspx?BlogID=86&stitle=WCI).
</kraj>
SP2010 je vrlo cool stvari, ali ja bih da sam namjestila jezik na popisu i knjižnicama postavke "stranica kada je u pitanju upravljanje vrstama sadržaja:
Isti jezik je bio na mjestu za WSS / MOSS. Dovoljno je promijeniti riječ "Delete" da "ukloni", a to će samo običan više smisla.
Slijedite me na Twitter-u http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
</kraj>
Moj najnoviji članak za SharePointBriefing.com je i mrda ovdje: http://sharepointbriefing.com/features/article.php/3887276/The-Road-to-SharePoint-Mastery.htm
Evo teaser:
To je u osnovi prilično kratak i sažet verzija mog najpopularnijih javnog predstavljanja na "Na naučiti SharePoint." Nema šale Banjo, međutim.
Check it out!
</kraj>
Slijedite me na Twitter-u http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
(Primijetiti: ovaj članak je unakrsno objavljena ovdje: http://www.endusersharepoint.com/?p=1912)
Ažurirati 09/01/09: Na temelju twitter poruci, I need to clarify that InfoPath is supported in the sense that BPOS provides forms libraries. What I mean when I write "not supported in any way" is that InfoPath forms services functions are not supported. That means that you can’t publish an InfoPath form to BPOS and and have it render in the web browser. It also means that some out of the box workflows, koji koriste InfoPath (čak iu Moss standardnom izdanju) don’t work in BPOS because their initiation and other forms use InfoPath. Hopefully that clears things up.
Imao sam priliku da se stvarno kopaju na Microsoft Online u ponudi je ranije ove godine, a posebno poslovne produktivnosti online suite (BPOS). This came along before I even hard a firm plan to set out on my own at Arcovis. I immediately saw, međutim, BPOS da bi mogao biti ključni dio moje tvrtke unutarnje infrastrukture i vremenom, it has become exactly that. Arcovis, uses it on a daily basis. I thought I’d share some of that experience from a practical perspective in case you want to evaluate it for yourself or are just curious about it.
Kao što riječ "suite" u BPOS podrazumijeva, ste dobili mali paket aplikacija:
Možete kupiti svaki od njih zasebno, Vjerujem. It’s all spelled out relatively clearly on the Microsoft je online stranica. You may be able to get better deals through MSFT partners. Arcovis has been working with Cloud Strategije i čini se da znam njihove stvari, pa bih ih uključiti u svoj popis dobavljača, ako to učinite više dobavljača traži.
Sam iznijeti moje iskustvo i misli za svaki od njih, odnosno.
Ovo je domaćin razmjene okoliša i iz moje perspektive, it works like any other Exchange server I have ever used. It’s fully integrated with all of my fellow Arcovis partners’ environments and gives me access to the calendar (što je veliki). Good stuff.
Ona također pruža Outlook Web Access (OWA) interface. That means I can get my email on any machine that has a web browser.
Moj HTC mobilni telefon, Windows Mobile 6.1(?) connected to it nicely via Active Sync. It did this in exactly the way I expected and wanted.
Ne smatram sebe mnogo više od usputnog pogleda i razmjenu korisnika, tako da mogu biti jako važni Tečaj značajke koje jednostavno ne podržava i ne bi nužno znati.
I think the strongest recommendation I make for this is that I am completely unaware that my exchange environment is “somewhere else.” I don’t know see any difference in Exchange and how I use it on a daily basis versus the half dozen or so other times I used someone’s exchange environment. Zapravo, to je bolje, jer to jednostavno funkcionira.
Bottom line - domaćin razmjene je ono što treba biti, a ja sam vrlo sretna s njim.
This is a truly indispensible tool when you’re in the consulting business. I fire up instant live meetings several times a week to show intermediate work product to clients, gledati ih slomiti moje rješenja, tako da znam kako ih popraviti, učiniti prodajne prezentacije, itd.. Live meeting is bundled with BPOS and it’s very easy to use.
I’m even less of a live meeting expert than I am on exchange. Međutim, za svoje potrebe, to je super.
Do sada je, I use communicator almost only for presence information. I say “only” but have that presence data available to me whenever I’m connect has become addictive. With communicator installed and running, moje kolege znaju kada sam dostupan, ono što je moj raspored je kao u ovom trenutku, i može mi IM (iako IM sučelje je prilično dosadno, u najboljem slučaju). It’s one of those things that I really miss when I don’t have it. I actually get a little annoyed when my colleagues aren’t running communicator because the presence information is missing.
The presence indicator feels pervasive. It shows up in SharePoint whenever their name appears as an author to a document, dodijeljen zadatak, itd.. It shows in email, embedded right in outlook. It shows up in the communicator client itself.
For the most it just sits there running in the background and decorates my outlook and SharePoint screens with real-time presence information. It’s very cool.
Moje omiljeno malo, naravno, is SharePoint.
BPOS provides a modified version of MOSS standard edition. I’ll explain “modified” below. We’ve been using our BPOS SharePoint portal for stuff like:
U osnovi, sve stvari koje biste očekivati da će koristiti za SharePoint.
Uz put, mi koristimo tehničke značajke kao što su:
Što ne mogu učiniti s njom? There are a bunch of things that would be nice:
The last bit is a little sad because we can’t do as much search configuration I would like.
Vi zapravo odustati od puno tehničkih sposobnosti i prisiljeni su živjeti u granicama out-of-the-box SharePoint funkcionalnosti.
I can live with that. I have found myself wanting to slap together an event receiver or use a custom action once or twice,, ali za najveći dio, Ja ne primijetiti nedostatak.
I should add that this is not a comprehensive list of the differences between a hosted “on prem” MOSS environment and SharePoint on line. Cloud Strategies has a very detailed presentation that goes into all that if you’re interested. I’m speaking from the perspective of a business owner leveraging the tool.
Microsoft nudi divan desktop aplikaciju koja omogućuje brz i jednostavan pristup svim funkcijama BPOS:
Ne morate ga koristiti, ali eliminira potrebu za prijavu u svakoj od aplikacija posebno i za Live Meeting, To je prilično lijepo, jer možete napraviti "Meet sada" sjednicu sa samo 2 klikne (jednom na "web konferencija" gumb iznad, a drugi na web preglednik koji pops gore). It’s also nice to get OWA with one click, iako možete samo staviti da u Vašem favorite, kao i.
The other major advantage with this desktop application is that it provides a background kind of single sign on service. As long as this is running in the background, Ja mogu otvoriti web preglednike i spojiti se na moju BPOS okoliš bez potrebe za ulazak vjerodajnice.
Microsoft made BPOS available to me for free so I am not currently paying the monthly per user fee at this time. Međutim, Vidim vrijednost tamo i možete prihvatiti na vjeru (ili ne) that I would pay for this service. The fact is that I can’t count on Microsoft providing this for free forever and it’s become so strongly integrated with my business that moving … the mind quails.
BPOS is an insanely feature rich platform. Razmjena, SharePoint (MOSS standard!), prisutnost, izravne susrete uživo - to je puno funkcionalnosti da bi bolno, sorely miss if I had to live without it. My business would be severely impacted without it. Could I find replacement functionality? Probably, ali mislim da bi ga kaldrma zajedno s raznim drugim dobavljačima, complicating my life. BPOS has so far proven itself to be stable and reliable. For the right kind of customer (kao što su moje tvrtke), BPOS vrijedi snažan razmatranje.
</kraj>
Slijedite me na Twitter-u http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
Ja sam bio sljedećem MSDN forum za više od godinu dana (, a možda i gotovo 2 godine u ovom trenutku) and every now and then I hear from someone how “hard” it is to do that. I find it quite easy and thought I’d share my “technique”. This technique also works for www.endusersharepoint.com (http://www.endusersharepoint.com/STP).
Uzimajući MSDN kao primjer, Prvi put sam ići na standardne forum stranice kao što su opća pitanja za SharePoint glavnu stranicu ovdje: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepointgeneral/threads
Trebali biste odmah primijetiti da su forumi RSS omogućen, kao što je prikazano:
Ive 'bio koristeći Google Reader za upravljanje moje RSS feedove za dugo vremena sada (www.google.com / reader). I go there, add the RSS feed for the forum and now I’m getting all new forums posts via RSS. My Google feeds for SharePoint forums look like this:
Google omogućuje mi je lijep pogled na objavljivanje sama:
I na kraju, Google omogućuje mi da koristite tipkovnicu za kretanje kroz postove u forumima na taj način.
Ja mogu brzo skenirati kroz postove i usredotočiti se samo na one Osjećam da mogu učiniti koristan doprinos.
Alerts close the loop. Updates to posts don’t come through RSS (iako mislim da su se dugo vremena prije). Međutim, ako sam objaviti odgovor na forumu knjiženja, the forums alert me via email and IM that someone responded in turn. Ili, ako ne mogu dati koristan doprinos, ali želim znati što drugi imaju za reći, Ja mogu bušiti u nju i izričito tražiti upozorenja kada drugi ne reagira.
U sat vremena ili manje možete postaviti ovaj proces i, a za tjedan dana redovite uporabe, naučiti razne trikove i tipkovničke prečace, tako da to postaje druga priroda.
I use the exact same technique for End User SharePoint.Com’s “Stump the Panel” forums. This is their RSS feed: http://www.endusersharepoint.com/STP/rss/.
Forumi su strašan način, vjerojatno najbolji način kratak izravnog osobnog iskustva, učenja proizvod i uzimajući lijep pregled o tome kako je svijet, u cjelini, uses SharePoint. Give it a try!
</kraj>
Slijedite me na Twitter-u http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
Razlog ćemo provesti toliko vremena (ili bi trebao, u svakom slučaju) working out governance plans is because we want the SharePoint solution to be as effective as possible. We want good infrastructure and rules to keep it humming and safe in case of disaster. We want good security processes to both properly secure the environment but also make it reasonable to manage. We want a good information architecture that will stand the test of time, ideally managing to survive a major organizational change in the company.
Da bi se postigao taj cilj poželjan, Upravljanje dokument i plan može dopasti u hrpu "Ti će" i "ti neće ih", kao u:
"Ti će" i "Ti ne" svakako imaju svoje mjesto u planu upravljanja.
A more successful governance plan will also have a strong marketing angle. It should sell and justify itself to the maximum extent possible. A truly successful governance plan relies upon the voluntary cooperation of all SharePoint users. (Postoje slučajevi u kojima rese zajednica suradnja nije potrebna, kao kad SharePoint koristi vrlo malom broju usko uspio korisnika; Siguran sam da možete misliti o drugima). If the user community doesn’t buy into your governance plan then it will be partially successful at best.
I use that word “buy” deliberately. The community will buy the governance plan if it’s fundamentally sound and you go to some effort to sell them on it. Selling leads to marketing and that’s why I think that a governance plan should be considered a marketing plan too. Convince your end users that they need to follow the governance plan and they will voluntarily follow it. If you can get a critical mass of people following the governance plan then the plan’s benefits follow and you’ll have a stronger environment for it.
</kraj>
Slijedite me na Twitter-u http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
Mogao bih napisati na na velike duljine oko MSDN forumima, etiketa, konvencije imenovanja, Usporedite, itd.. I may do that, zapravo. I wanted to point out a small thing which may help people have a better overall experience.
Ja u zadnje vrijeme sam reći ljudima da ako naiđete na nekakav problem s vašim SharePoint okoliš, Razvojni projekt ili druge srodne aktivnosti SharePoint, post a question to the forums earlier in your action chain rather than later. I know for myself that when I have a problem, a number of potential solutions present themselves right away. I order these potential solutions in terms of likelihood, applicability and how easy they are to investigate. I go through that list and by the time I’ve gotten to #10, Ja sam stvaranje registra promjene na ključnim "/ foo / bar / almostThere / isThisIt / noThisIsNotIt / iCantBelieveIAmDoingThis / finallyThere!"Na savjet blogu naći na stranici 8 of a Google search. When that doesn’t work, Napokon sam se postavljati pitanje na MSDN (e.g. ovdje: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepointgeneral/threads).
I suggest that you reverse that approach. Post the forums much earlier in your investigation because:
Tako, u osnovi, to je jednostavno i besplatno, a imate dobar pucao na dobivanje nekakav odgovor, ali to će potrajati neko vrijeme da biste dobili taj odgovor (opet, ako ste sretni).
I used to think that I should hold off on looking for community help because I don’t want to waste someone’s time asking for help when I could find it out myself. Some forum moderators and active participants may feel that way, ali ja ne (barem, Ne osjećam se tako više). I don’t see any downside. The worst case is that you post a question and then answer it yourself some time later, possibly “wasting” some one’s time. I don’t see a big risk in that and there’s value in the researching of questions like that in any event.
</kraj>
Slijedite me na Twitter-u http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
I’ve read a few retrospectives on 2008 and this has got me to thinking about 2009. Here are my guesses at the future of SharePoint in 2009.
I’m a SharePoint MVP and as a result, I sometimes get a little advance information before it’s public. I am NOT making any such information public. I really haven’t been around long enough to be entrusted with that kind of stuff anyway.
With that out of the way, on to the predictions …
I believe that FAST will become a very hot topic in 2009. It’s already well known in the enterprise search community. Međutim, everyone that plays around with SharePoint in 2009 will soon be interested in this product and what it can do for them. New consulting companies will spring up around it and existing partners will work and scramble to add it to its portfolio. This time next year, almost everyone in the SharePoint community will have heard of and have an opinion about FAST.
FAST is targeted at large companies and that will continue. I think there’s at least an outside chance that Microsoft will release a more focused version of the product that is accessible to smaller companies. Failing that, they will open up the SharePoint search engine so that it can be customized along the lines that FAST can be customized. Na primjer, FAST uses pipeline architecture for consuming content and indexing it. FAST admins and developers can assemble pipeline components per data source and even create new pipeline components. We don’t have this flexibility with SharePoint today. If FAST remains firmly targeted at very large companies, SharePoint search će usvojiti neke od značajki Brzi.
Vjerujem da će izaći u 2009.
I believe that it will provide us the ability to secure views on a list or document library. This may be more of a hope than a belief 🙂
Nadam se da će dati neke bolju podršku za krajnje korisnike u programu SharePoint Designer tijeka rada, a posebice.
Ne znam puno ostalo, I have been actively tracking what I do find here: http://delicious.com/pagalvin/SharePoint_O14.
Danas, most SharePoint vendors seem to be gadget oriented. Take Bambus ili Corasworks na primjer. They have a huge following and great portfolio of products. Međutim, they seem sort of gadgety to me or developer / tool focused. Admin tools, workflow tools, itd.. That’s not a criticism at all because SharePoint can definitely use some gadgets.
U 2009, some vendors (and very possibly Bamboo themselves, if I read this correctly) will put together verticalized business applications in the form of templates, features, solutions, itd.. I’m thinking about the fabulous forty templates today but tailored to specific industries. I’m sort of surprised it’s not already exploited this way. SharePoint is a platform for delivering these kinds of things. What’s everyone waiting for? They won’t wait any longer in 2009.
Istovremeno, Silverlight and other cool .NET stuff will fuel new, better and more interesting gadgets.
Sharepointreviews.com will become the essential community catalog of these products.
2009 will see the emergence of the End User as a major focus for bloggers, organizations and Microsoft themselves. Mark Miller’s End User SharePoint.Com played a big role in 2008 and will continue to do so in 2009. End Users will begin to blog, pomoći da se transformira u manje skupine korisnika tehničke prostorima, pa čak i uvjeriti nekoga ili organizacija lansirati čisti krajnjeg korisnika usmjerena konferencijski.
Speaking of conferences – they will continue to expand and grow in number and focus. Aside from end user content, oni će i dalje za snabdjevanje hranom za programere i administratore.
Virtualni konferencije će početi pokupiti i postojeće konferencija će pružiti live feedova s udaljenim polaznicima koji ne mogu ili ne žele osobno prisustvovati.
Besplatno prostorima će se proširiti, kao što su Mike Lotter-a (sur) SharePoint subota.
To će biti vrlo važno jer će i dalje biti veliki priliv novih programere, admini i krajnji korisnici koji će se žudnja vrsta informacija ove grupe pružaju.
Demand for social computing features will rise. All things being equal, companies that implement effective social computing strategies will do better and be stronger than their competitors.
Smaller companies will adopt these features more quickly and effectively than large companies.
Large companies: beware 🙂
U 2008, a lot of SharePoint bloggers and organizations and Microsoft themselves spent a lot of time figuring out the best way to solve certain problems (usually technical problems).
There are still opportunities to define and foster adoption of best practices. Međutim, while we’ve been figuring out the best way to install, configure and manage SharePoint, hundreds and thousands of companies have been installing, configuring and managing SharePoint without those best practices at hand.
U 2009, a lot of companies are going to realize they have some deeply rooted problems to solve and will be looking to the elite members of the SharePoint community and Microsoft for help to fix them. I think this will extend well into 2010 and possibly spawn a cottage industry providing remediation services for companies that really need and use SharePoint, but are hurting badly because of poor decisions made early in their implementation.
U 2009, the Mother Ship will return and bring Bob Fox home.
I didn’t start working with SharePoint myself in any real way until January 2007. It seems to me that SharePoint has really taken off and proven itself capable of delivering a lot of value in these two years. I think that in many ways, it didn’t really straighten itself out until the infrastructure update. It still has its bugs and problems, but we’ve all come along way since 01/2007. 2009 is going to be a banner year for SharePoint.
</kraj>
Slijedite me na Twitter-u http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin
To je prilično popularan "nevjerojatan 40" predložak. It also has a bug which is widely known (Čak sam blogged o kako to popraviti).
Sogeti objavio codeplex projekt ovaj tjedan da popravlja bug (što je lijep sam po sebi, ali ne i zemlja-drobljenje) ali oni također tvrde da su riješili puno problema thornier: sigurnosni. The fab 40 Predložak zahtijeva vrlo velikodušan sigurnosna postavka (korisnik treba pristup Muški razini na gotovo svemu). Not any more! According to the codeplex summary:
"Ovaj predložak uključuje i novi prilagođeni tijek akcije koja omogućuje predložak za rad bez potrebe da svi korisnici pridonijeti dozvolama za popis kolegija."
To je dobra stvar i vrijedan checking out.
</kraj>
