Category Archives: June 2010

"Potest” versus "si fac” in SharePoint ipsum

Interdum pluribus donari puto, propter melius phrase, iuvenes-puer requisita. Finem user vere, pessime amet velit certis, vel a ipsum speciei diribitio structura vel ad interficiam de unum click vel menu bene lenire navigationem vel [inserere vehe tenuit opinio quod fit ad esse iniuriam]. Ut SharePoint pro scriptor, nos potest plerumque occursum prope genus exigentiam cum suggestu, sed de eis, nos scire in corde quod:

Num sunt proportionata quantum ad effectum deducendi (et ergo constant magis)
Sunt ad esse altus consuetudinem et ergo difficile ad esse et troubleshoot
Est est facile SharePoint adventu occurrit 80% vel de exigentiam (i.e. occurrit Spirtus de exigentiam, non hac epistola)

Imo linea, Scimus "arcu", ut vere iustus a mauris vel aliqua iusta, sed quod populus vivere cum magis quam consumere multum tempus conatur ad "solvere."

Puto de his ut "puerum" requisita quia vidi hoc exemplar multis ante. Haedos marcescent et caballum te nova LUDIBRIUM hebdomades ad tempus. Te eos in LUDIBRIUM, ludo et cum dies aliquot horas aut stilo, numquam ad colligunt illud rursus. Aut, non adepto LUDIBRIUM, in iugiter clausuris et hedum movet in fieri Praeses liberum mundi. Mauris fermentum id in SharePoint. Arbitrium fabri aut adepto quod volunt et fit insolita aut underused munus vel non adepto quod volunt et project adhuc succedit usquam.

Ego admonitus quod hodie in a forum post et probaverunt quam Clayton Cobb Fusce in forum ad repellendum temptaverunt de huiuscemodi rebus: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepointinfopath/thread/af8a1941-92ad-4f1a-b1bf-875e28ea79b7/

Sum vere curiosus quam populus considerandam hunc et quomodo agere. Sum ego absentis punctum? Tibi consilia ad iuvencum iudiciis fabri a overinvesting in levia requisita? Placere relinquere a comment.

</finem>

Scribet ad mea blog.

Sequi me in Twitter ad http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

Vivos Tip: Addens mauris ad MUSCUS Publishing Pages

1 Respondere

Cum crevit MUSCUS publising pages usura mauris, Ego ledo sequenti celeritate gibba:

Server Error in ‘/’ Applicationem.

Parser Error

Descriptio: Errorem facta in parsing de a resource requiritur ad serviamus petitionem. Lorem sequenti speciei parse error details et modify caput file convenienter.

Parser Error Nuntius: Only Content controls are allowed directly in a content page that contains Content controls.

Principium Error:

Line 10: Line 11: Line 12: <script Line 13: type="text/javascript" Line 14: src="/jQuery/jquery-1.4.min.js">

Principium File: /_catalogs/masterpage/KCC_FacultyMember.aspx Linea: 12

Versionem Information: Microsoft. NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.4927; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.4927

It was easy enough to fix (h/t to my colleague, Uday Ethirajulu). Be sure that the jQuery code lives inside the “PlaceHolderAdditionalPageHead” as shown:

<áspidis:Content ContentPlaceholderID="PlaceHolderAdditionalPageHead" runat="server">

<script

    type="text/javascript"

    src="/jQuery/jquery-1.4.min.js">

</script>

<script type="text/javascript">

$(document).paratos(munus() {

   // Brilliant jQuery stuff goes here.

   });

</script>

</finem>

Scribet ad mea blog.

Sequi me in Twitter ad http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

A Parva transversum delatus…

Aliquam responsum

SP2010 est frigus effercio, sed volo sunt esset adaequatum lingua in album et bibliothecis occasus 'pages cum venit ad administrandi contentus genera:

Eodem sermone in locum WSS / MUSCUS. Mutato nomine "Delete" ad "removere" quod sit simpliciter magis sensus.

Scribet ad mea blog.

Sequi me in Twitter ad http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

</finem>

Articuli, "M. SharePoint”

Aliquam responsum

My latest article for SharePointBriefing.com is up and kicking here: http://sharepointbriefing.com/features/article.php/3887276/The-Road-to-SharePoint-Mastery.htm

Hic elit:

Hoc est basically a pulchellus brevi et condensatione version meae popularis publica praesentationis in "ad discite SharePoint." Non banjo iocos, autem.

Reprehendo eam!

</finem>

Scribet ad mea blog.

Sequi me in Twitter ad http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

BPOS 2010 et "Superset”

2 Restituo

I was reading one of these pretty generic blah-like articles on BPOS (Microsoft scriptor commutationem et SharePoint in nube) et gratanter waded per ad finem:

In terminos alia prope-terminus deliverables, Microsoft est committat providere in BPOS v.Next patria PowerShell scripting via a PowerShell terminus aedificare in PowerShell Version 2. Authentication will be done through Online IDs, with a single credential being able to be used for both PowerShell and the portal.Keane echoed the message other Microsoft execs have been voicing at TechEd this week: Cloud capabilities, over time, will become a superset of what is available on-premises. Currently, the reverse is true, and Microsoft’s Online services offer a subset of the functions available in the software equivalents of each product.

The notion that the cloud will provide more capability than on-premise is new to me. I wonder how true that is going to be in the end. It feels counterintuitive to me. I totally get the idea that a lot of companies will move stuff to the cloud (or start off in the cloud) but I normally think they do it because the pro’s (easier admin, SLAs, etc) far outweigh the cons (reduced functionality).

I’m having a little bit of a hard time believing that cloud offerings will exceed on-prem capabilities. Multi-tenant is hard and seems like it must force compromises in order to provide good SLA and ease of use…

I’ll probably be eating my words on this. I remember thinking that no one could possibly need more than 650 mb of data and therefore, the CD was never going to be improved upon.

</finem>

Scribet ad mea blog.

Sequi me in Twitter ad http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

SharePoint sabbati Baltimore velit

2 Restituo

Ego dubitant transire hoc per data quod "banjo iocos" est non bene, sed ... finis-de-August SharePoint sabbati (Nullam edition) organizers habere tondere usque petens suggessit locos. Ire hic impleat ex: http://www.sharepointsaturday.org/baltimore/default.aspx

Vote early and vote often 🙂

Sed graviter, tantum suffragium semel.

</finem>

Scribet ad mea blog.

Sequi me in Twitter ad http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

Uti Workflow ad simulare Content Type Obses

3 Restituo

Alia die, aliud MSDN-forums inspirata post.

Aliquis est an sunt posse a contentus typus ut cum a user clicks in "novum" Button in consuetudinem album, Lorem ipsum sed ad ipsum quod videtur alicui conceditur in occumbo-down album. Ut scire, Quisque et sic non subest.

Hanc quaestionem venit, et nunc iam de, EGO had a novus ratio. Sit scriptor id nos talem missionem:

Habemus helpdesk ratio ticketing.
In helpdesk ticketing ratio permittit users intrare iusto helpdesk tessera info, ut problema area, status quaestionis, etc.
Volumus ut "eximius" users dare an "urgere" ager.
Agrum non accedere ad alia users. Ratio mos tribuo semper "medium" gradu eorum petitiones ad prioritatem.

Quid nos facere est creare contentus duobus diversis generibus et duabus tabulis SharePoint, pro "Lorem" et cetera dolor in omnes.

Workflow singulos album aemulatur notitia ad dominum album (ipsa helpdesk tessera album) et processus inde procedit,.

Aditus securitatem tam gradu agmen posset operari quadam effluant.

Non sum expertus, satis simplex ratio patitur, sed reddit, si pulchellus aspera, bene ut implement a ratio quaedam sufficiens, etiam gradu agmen securum.

</finem>

Scribet ad mea blog.

Sequi me in Twitter ad http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

Contentus Approbatio ut Misera hominis Lorem Item Level Obses

2 Restituo

Ibi est a communibus missionem InfoPath formae. Nos volo patitur populus implere ex InfoPath formae et subire eos ad a bibliotheca. Nos volo praesepia (et non aliud) ad aditus ad formae.

Occurrit quaestio, et deinceps formae (e.g. http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepointadmin/thread/76ccef5a-d71c-4b7c-963c-613157e2a966/?prof=required)

Hoc est a velox via ut solvere possint placere contentus in bibliotheca formam. Vade bibliotheca scriptor version occasus et erexit illum ostenderat:

Click in "contentus approbatione Requirit" et quod tibi dabit valorem Draft colligunt Item Obses.

It’s a little counter-intuitive because we don’t think in terms of “content approval” when all we want to do is prevent people from seeing other users’ forms. Autem, it works well (in experientia). Just don’t approve those forms and they’ll always be considered “drafts”.

Give approval rights to the people who should be able to see them and you’ve closed the loop.

This isn’t exactly big news, but the question does come up with some regularity, so I thought it would be worth posting.

</finem>

Scribet ad mea blog.

Sequi me in Twitter ad http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

SharePoint Online et InfoPath

2 Restituo

Extremum hoc intellegere quis potest, sed SharePoint Online (quod frequenter dicunt est glorificatus WSS) sustinet InfoPath Formae ipsum. Quod suus pulchellus potens effercio, praesertim IP FS est a MUSCUS Enterprise pluma et BPOS est quasi $ 1.99/month enim 10,000 users. Maybe it’s a little more than that.

Ita, SharePoint Online defies easy definition. It has this enterprise feature, but no anonymous access (which even WSS supports). You can do some interesting stuff with search (MOSS-ish, since you can define site level scopes), Si vos postulo ut obvius ssp, non potes facere illud. You can play the “on the one hand and on the other” game all night long with this product 🙂

Lorem SP nova Aliquam dimittere debitum intra paucos menses. Miror, quod suus 'iens futurus Ridiculum Hybrid?

</finem>

Scribet ad mea blog.

Sequi me in Twitter ad http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin