Tag →: SharePoint Obses

Uti Workflow ad simulare Content Type Obses

3 Restituo

Alia die, aliud MSDN-forums inspirata post.

Aliquis est an sunt posse a contentus typus ut cum a user clicks in "novum" Button in consuetudinem album, Lorem ipsum sed ad ipsum quod videtur alicui conceditur in occumbo-down album.  Ut scire, Quisque et sic non subest.

Hanc quaestionem venit, et nunc iam de, EGO had a novus ratio.  Sit scriptor id nos talem missionem:

  • Habemus helpdesk ratio ticketing.
  • In helpdesk ticketing ratio permittit users intrare iusto helpdesk tessera info, ut problema area, status quaestionis, etc.
  • Volumus ut "eximius" users dare an "urgere" ager.
  • Agrum non accedere ad alia users.  Ratio mos tribuo semper "medium" gradu eorum petitiones ad prioritatem.

Quid nos facere est creare contentus duobus diversis generibus et duabus tabulis SharePoint, pro "Lorem" et cetera dolor in omnes.

Workflow singulos album aemulatur notitia ad dominum album (ipsa helpdesk tessera album) et processus inde procedit,.

Aditus securitatem tam gradu agmen posset operari quadam effluant. 

Non sum expertus, satis simplex ratio patitur, sed reddit, si pulchellus aspera, bene ut implement a ratio quaedam sufficiens, etiam gradu agmen securum.

</finem>

Scribet ad mea blog.

Sequi me in Twitter ad http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

Contentus Approbatio ut Misera hominis Lorem Item Level Obses

2 Restituo

Ibi est a communibus missionem InfoPath formae.  Nos volo patitur populus implere ex InfoPath formae et subire eos ad a bibliotheca.  Nos volo praesepia (et non aliud) ad aditus ad formae.

Occurrit quaestio, et deinceps formae (e.g. http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepointadmin/thread/76ccef5a-d71c-4b7c-963c-613157e2a966/?prof=required)

Hoc est a velox via ut solvere possint placere contentus in bibliotheca formam.  Vade bibliotheca scriptor version occasus et erexit illum ostenderat:

image 

Click in "contentus approbatione Requirit" et quod tibi dabit valorem Draft colligunt Item Obses.

It’s a little counter-intuitive because we don’t think in terms of “content approval” when all we want to do is prevent people from seeing other users’ forms.  Autem, it works well (in experientia).  Just don’t approve those forms and they’ll always be considered “drafts”. 

Give approval rights to the people who should be able to see them and you’ve closed the loop.

This isn’t exactly big news, but the question does come up with some regularity, so I thought it would be worth posting.

</finem>

Scribet ad mea blog.

Sequi me in Twitter ad http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin