СПД тока: Покажи Фулл име уместо домен корисничко име

У оно што се чини свом инаугуралном блогу, цхикнлипс је понирао у лудило које је израчуната колона и описано решење на заједничком СхареПоинт Десигнер тока проблем е активности: Како приказати право име особе у е-поруци, уместо "домен корисничко име."

Нисам га тестирао сам, but it looks promising. Цхецк ит оут.

</крај>

Претплатите се на мој блог.

Следите ме на Туиттер на http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

Тецхнорати Тагс: ,

Прогнозе за СхареПоинт 2009

Прочитао сам неколико ретроспективу о 2008 and this has got me to thinking about 2009. Here are my guesses at the future of SharePoint in 2009.

Мала Дисцлаимер

Ја сам СхареПоинт МВП и као резултат, I sometimes get a little advance information before it’s public. I am NOT making any such information public. I really haven’t been around long enough to be entrusted with that kind of stuff anyway.

With that out of the way, on to the predictions …

ФАСТ

I believe that FAST will become a very hot topic in 2009. It’s already well known in the enterprise search community. Међутим, everyone that plays around with SharePoint in 2009 will soon be interested in this product and what it can do for them. New consulting companies will spring up around it and existing partners will work and scramble to add it to its portfolio. This time next year, almost everyone in the SharePoint community will have heard of and have an opinion about FAST.

FAST is targeted at large companies and that will continue. I think there’s at least an outside chance that Microsoft will release a more focused version of the product that is accessible to smaller companies. Failing that, they will open up the SharePoint search engine so that it can be customized along the lines that FAST can be customized. На пример, FAST uses pipeline architecture for consuming content and indexing it. FAST admins and developers can assemble pipeline components per data source and even create new pipeline components. We don’t have this flexibility with SharePoint today. If FAST remains firmly targeted at very large companies, SharePoint search will adopt some of FAST’s features.

SharePoint V.Next

I believe it will come out in 2009.

I believe that it will provide us the ability to secure views on a list or document library. Ово може бити више наде него веровања 🙂

I hope it will provide some better support for end users in SharePoint Designer and particularly workflow.

I don’t know much else, I have been actively tracking what I do find here: http://delicious.com/pagalvin/SharePoint_O14.

Vendors Will Create Business Applications

Данас, most SharePoint vendors seem to be gadget oriented. Take Бамбус или Corasworks на пример. They have a huge following and great portfolio of products. Међутим, they seem sort of gadgety to me or developer / tool focused. Admin tools, workflow tools, итд. That’s not a criticism at all because SharePoint can definitely use some gadgets.

У 2009, some vendors (and very possibly Bamboo themselves, if I read this correctly) will put together verticalized business applications in the form of templates, features, solutions, итд. I’m thinking about the fabulous forty templates today but tailored to specific industries. I’m sort of surprised it’s not already exploited this way. SharePoint is a platform for delivering these kinds of things. What’s everyone waiting for? They won’t wait any longer in 2009.

Истовремено, Silverlight and other cool .NET stuff will fuel new, better and more interesting gadgets.

Sharepointreviews.com will become the essential community catalog of these products.

End User Focus

2009 will see the emergence of the End User as a major focus for bloggers, organizations and Microsoft themselves. Mark Miller’s End User SharePoint.Com played a big role in 2008 and will continue to do so in 2009. End Users will begin to blog, help to transform user groups into less technical venues and even convince someone or organization to launch a pure End User focused conference.

Conferences, User Groups, Code Camps, итд

Speaking of conferences – they will continue to expand and grow in number and focus. Aside from end user content, they will continue to cater to developers and administrators.

Virtual conferences will start to pick up and existing conferences will provide live feeds to remote attendees who cannot or choose not to attend in person.

Free venues will expand, као такав Mike Lotter’s (et al) СхареПоинт субота.

This is going to be very important because there will continue to be a large influx of new developers, admins and end users who will be craving the kind of information these groups provide.

Social Computing

Demand for social computing features will rise. All things being equal, companies that implement effective social computing strategies will do better and be stronger than their competitors.

Smaller companies will adopt these features more quickly and effectively than large companies.

Large companies: пази 🙂

Best Practices versus Remediation

У 2008, a lot of SharePoint bloggers and organizations and Microsoft themselves spent a lot of time figuring out the best way to solve certain problems (usually technical problems).

There are still opportunities to define and foster adoption of best practices. Међутим, while we’ve been figuring out the best way to install, configure and manage SharePoint, hundreds and thousands of companies have been installing, configuring and managing SharePoint without those best practices at hand.

У 2009, a lot of companies are going to realize they have some deeply rooted problems to solve and will be looking to the elite members of the SharePoint community and Microsoft for help to fix them. I think this will extend well into 2010 and possibly spawn a cottage industry providing remediation services for companies that really need and use SharePoint, but are hurting badly because of poor decisions made early in their implementation.

The Mother Ship Will Return

У 2009, the Mother Ship will return and bring Bob Fox home.

Final Thoughts

I didn’t start working with SharePoint myself in any real way until January 2007. It seems to me that SharePoint has really taken off and proven itself capable of delivering a lot of value in these two years. I think that in many ways, it didn’t really straighten itself out until the infrastructure update. It still has its bugs and problems, but we’ve all come along way since 01/2007. 2009 is going to be a banner year for SharePoint.

</крај>

Претплатите се на мој блог.

Следите ме на Туиттер на http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

Тецхнорати Тагс: , ,

СхареПоинт Најбоље праксе Конференција фебруар 2-4, 2009

Ја ћу да радим две презентације на СхареПоинт Најбоље праксе конференција овог фебруара у Сан Дијегу.

Нисам радио ово довољно дуго да се изнурен од њега, па сваки конференција сам присуствовао је, искрено, awesome. Међутим, I do think this conference is special. There is zero marketing focus and the whole thing is about offering real-world practical advice on how to untangle some of the thorniest issues we face dealing with SharePoint. It’s not gigantic, тако да све од говорника су веома приступачне (барем када не гашење пожара вратио кући). This means that in addition to the great formal presentations, можете имати неке велике разговоре и дебате на сваки звучник у скоро сваком тренутку, starting with communal breakfast up to late night imbibing at the hotel bar.

Иза звучника, you’ll have great opportunities to build and cement networks of other SharePoint users in the community. By the end of the last session and conference wrap-up, ћете се напајати и пуно добрих идеја да се врати на посао како би побољшали своје СхареПоинт окружење.

То је добро вреди инвестиције.

The web site is top notch. Цхецк ит оут за датуме, регистрација, теме и звучници.

</крај>

Претплатите се на мој блог.

Следите ме на Туиттер на http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

Читања 1,000 Блогу у 3 Недеља је као да гледате Лост Сеасон Фоур у викенд

Овог лета, while I was working on two chapters for the best SharePoint social computing book ever, I began to get very far behind in my blog reading. I use Google Reader for my RSS stuff and when you have more than 1000 непрочитаних чланака, само стоји, "1000 ".

Током последњих неколико недеља, I’ve been sitting down and systematically reading them and tagging them as I go for future reference (I use Delicious.com).

This past weekend I watched all of Lost, season four in a couple of sittings and catching up on 1000+ blog entries feels the same way.

</крај>

Претплатите се на мој блог.

Следите ме на Туиттер на http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

Тецхнорати Тагс:

Портинг СхареПоинт Десигнер тока посла из једне у другу листу

Марк Милер тамо код ввв.ендусерсхарепоинт.цом posted my latest article on SharePoint Designer workflow овде (http://www.endusersharepoint.com/?p=1037).

I describe the basic approach for moving a workflow you create in one list to another list. The other list can be in the same site, истој колекцији или сасвим друга фарма (e.g. од развоја до производње).

This is a complicated subject so I only covered a very basic scenario. Следеће недеље, I’ll write up a more useful real world example.

Check it out and share any comments there.

<крај>

Претплатите се на мој блог.

Следите ме на Туиттер на http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

Тецхнорати Тагс:

Зашто не могу да Лако луке СхареПоинт Десигнер Воркфлов решења са једне листе на другу?

Mark Miller has posted my latest End User oriented SharePoint Designer Workflow article up on his site here: http://www.endusersharepoint.com/?p=1008

I attempt to provide a straight-forward answer to the question, "Why can’t I easily port a SharePoint designer workflow from development to test?" In the process, I also give some insight into what SPD is actually doing behind the scenes when we use it to create a workflow solution.

Следеће недеље, I describe an End User friendly way to port SPD workflow from one server to another, or at least as End User friendly a solution as is possible given the state of the tool set.

</крај>

Претплатите се на мој блог.

Следите ме на Туиттер на http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

Дефинисање Финдабилити проблем

I had the good fortune of attending some partner training from FAST last spring. I was really impressed with the product and was looking forward to working with it. Unfortunately, one project fell through and then EMC acquired my company. Predictably, a certain amount of chaos ensued while we learned about EMC and EMC learned about us. FAST technology dropped a few points on the priority scale during that period. Међутим, Никада нисам изгубила интересовање за производ и, још интересантније, већи проблем финдабилити.

Ја стварно не волим ту реч, but I’m trying to get used to it 🙂 Despite it’s awkwardness, финдабилити је прави (или барем, настајању) term. Do a Ливе Сеарцх ако сте заинтересовани за проналажење више техничких дефиниција, али како ја то објасним у канцеларији је овако:

Интелектуални капитал који се не могу наћи можда и не постоји.

То је скоро као тачно да кажем:

Интелектуални капитал који се не могу наћи брзо и лако могу и да не постоји.

Интелектуални капитал (ИЦ) starts as an idea in a person’s head and is then refined via collaboration with colleagues and interactions with various communities. To be truly useful, these resulting ideas must be recorded. This is where the trouble begins 🙂

Ових дана, снимање обично значи да је идеја је документовано у облику МС Ворд доц, Екцел радна свеска, итд. and eventually stuck in electronic format on a hard drive somewhere. IC obviously takes other forms like, као и слике, видеос, високо информативне блогови, вики … it’s impossible to list them all. Истовремено, ИЦ се чувају у различитим местима попут система датотека, базе података, линија пословних апликација (ЕРП, ЦРМ, СхареПоинт, Доцументум), итд.

Ово је финдабилити проблема: како да брзо и лако пронађете ИЦ који је ускладиштен у десетине или стотине формата на десетине или стотине хиљада, десетине хиљада (усуђујем се да кажем стотина хиљада) локација у организацији?

It’s a difficult problem to solve. Бил енглески је писао о финдабилити from a very grand perspective in what I have come to think of as the Panama Canal approach. The history of the Panama Canal is amazing. In a nut shell, луди Француз (Фердинанд де Лессепс) започео приватну компанију за изградњу канала, Пројекат је напуштен за неколико година, picked up again and finally finished by the American government under President Roosevelt. This reminds me of Bill’s approach because as he rightly points out, solving the findability is both hard and never stops. It took years and years of effort from the some of the hardest working humans on the planet to start, наставити, и коначно завршити). And yet, it’s still not truly finished. Колико ја знам, се канал банке никада нису упознали своју угао мировања, што значи да су се схоред се и иначе одржава све до данас. Решавање финдабилити је на исти начин. Ја дефинитивно препоручујем да прочитате Билловој серију и да се претплатите на свом блогу на његове тачке гледишта на финдабилити, посебно се односи на СхареПоинт.

И ја сам заинтересован за овај проблем. Због мог излагања брз и у току расправе о овој теми са мојим генијалним ЕМЦ колега, Имам још неке идеје планирам да пишем о током наредних недеља и месеци. У мом следећем чланку о овом малом серије, Ја ћу да покушам да поставим оквир око проблема да покаже колико је заиста ужасно (it’s more awful than you think 🙂 ). То је грозно, али барем не уклапа у кутији.

</крај>

Претплатите се на мој блог.

Следите ме на Туиттер на http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

Тецхнорати Тагс: , ,

Лични Он-лине бацкуп мини-преглед: Мози

Једно од … нежељени ефекти … of working for a giant corporation is that I get a lot press releases in my inbox every month. I’m still new to the EMC world, тако да доста тих саопштења су, у основи, inscrutable. This or that company purchased these or those EMC products, blah blah blah. I’m not complaining. I actually take this as an incentive to learn more about EMC as time goes by so that I better understand the big picture of what EMC is all about (наговештај: ради се о Информације).

Неки пута, те саопштења су прилично лако разумети, а један од њих је био око Мози. Mozy is an on-line backup tool. You install a lightweight client on your workstation (лаптоп у мом случају), Ви кажете да је оно што желите да направите резервну копију и када и онда то ради слањем својих података на неком серверу(с) on the cloud. It does it in the background.

Мој првобитни резервна водио у нешто мање 4 hours and according to Mozy is 550MB or so of data. I only backed up "My Documents" (стога, релативно мала количина података).

Поново ран (Мислим да 24 сати касније), подржано још ствари у вези 8 записник. I never noticed it happen. There was no obvious impact on any work I was doing at the time.

Урадила сам тест обнови и обезбеђује пристојан довољно кориснички интерфејс је да изаберете фајл(с) you want to restore. It was quick, елегантан, информативан … Не знам како би то могло да буде боље.

I spoke to one of my colleagues about it who has more experience with online backup. He said that Mozy is good but that it lacks an ability to tell Mozy to do the equivalent of "restore files that I deleted." This is to say that if you don’t know you deleted a fie, или ако то урадите, али не сећам се своје име, Мози не може да вам помогне много у смислу лако налаз је да се обнови.

They impose a 2GB limit if you just want to use the service for free. It looks like it’s $5/month for unlimited storage.

Боттом лине, Ако ме неко пита да ли треба да Мози користе за онлине бацкуп, мој одговор сада је, "Hell, yes."

</крај>

Претплатите се на мој блог.

Следите ме на Туиттер на http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin

Тецхнорати Тагс: ,