I had the good fortune of attending some partner training from FAST last spring. I was really impressed with the product and was looking forward to working with it. Zoritxarrez, one project fell through and then EMC acquired my company. Predictably, a certain amount of chaos ensued while we learned about EMC and EMC learned about us. FAST technology dropped a few points on the priority scale during that period. Hala eta guztiz ere, Galduko, inoiz ez dut nire interes produktua eta, are interesgarriagoa, handiagoa arazoa Lokalizatzeko.
Ez dut gustuko hitza, but I’m trying to get used to it 🙂 Despite it’s awkwardness, Lokalizatzeko benetako (edo, gutxienez,, azaleratzen ari diren) term. Do a Live Search Oraindik gehiago teknikoaren definizioak aurkitzeko interesa izanez gero, baina bidea azaldu nuen bulegoan inguruan hau bezalakoa da:
Kapital intelektuala ezin dela aurkitu ahal izango baita, ez da existitzen.
Ia egia da hau esatea:
Kapital intelektuala ezin dela aurkitu azkar eta erraz daiteke, bai eta ez da existitzen.
Kapital intelektuala (IC) starts as an idea in a person’s head and is then refined via collaboration with colleagues and interactions with various communities. To be truly useful, these resulting ideas must be recorded. This is where the trouble begins 🙂
Egun hauetan, Grabaketa normalean esan nahi du ideia hori beti MS Word Doc forma dokumentatua, Excel Workbook, etc. and eventually stuck in electronic format on a hard drive somewhere. IC obviously takes other forms like, irudi bezala, bideoak, oso informativo blogak, orokorra … it’s impossible to list them all. Aldi berean,, IC da leku ugaritan gordetako fitxategi sistema bezala, datu-base, enpresa-aplikazioen line (ERP, CRM, SharePoint, Documentum), etc.
Hau da, Lokalizatzeko arazoa: nola azkar eta erraz aurkituko IC hori dozenaka edo formatu ehunka dozenaka edo ehunka mila batean gordetzen dira, milaka (Lotsa ehunka mila diot) erakunde baten kokaleku?
It’s a difficult problem to solve. Bill English izan da Lokalizatzeko idazten from a very grand perspective in what I have come to think of as the Panama Canal approach. The history of the Panama Canal is amazing. In a nut shell, zoro bat frantziarrak (Ferdinand de Lesseps) hasi enpresa pribatu canal eraikitzeko, proiektua izan zen urte batzuk abandonatu, picked up again and finally finished by the American government under President Roosevelt. This reminds me of Bill’s approach because as he rightly points out, solving the findability is both hard and never stops. It took years and years of effort from the some of the hardest working humans on the planet to start, jarraitu, eta, azkenik, amaitzeko). And yet, it’s still not truly finished. Den neurrian ezagutzen dut, canal en bankuek ez dute inoiz ezagutu bere repose angelu, meaning that they have to be shored up and otherwise maintained even to this day. Solving findability is the same way. I definitely recommend that you read Bill’s series and subscribe to his blog for his point of view on findability, bereziki erlazionatzen SharePoint da.
I too am interested in this problem. Due to my exposure to FAST and on-going discussions on this subject with my brilliant EMC colleagues, I have some more ideas I plan to write about over the coming weeks and months. In my next article on this little series, Eta saiatu jarri kutxa bat arazoaren inguruan nola awful da benetan erakusteko noa (it’s more awful than you think 🙂 ). It’s awful, but at least it does fit inside a box.
</amaiera>
Follow me on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/pagalvin